Commonwealth v. Quiles
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this opinion we are called upon to determine, inter alia, whether and to what extent law enforcement authorities must inquire as to an individual’s actual authority to consent to *156police entry into a dwelling. We conclude that law enforcement authorities need not question an individual as to his or her actual authority to consent, once that individual has consented to an entry of the premises. Accordingly, we reverse the suppression order and remand the instant matter to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
When reviewing the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BurnsideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- People v. McKinstreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ValentinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.