Legal Opinion

Hall v. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 18, 1941No. 156 CivilPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, District Judge.

The eight plaintiffs here sue the defendant for overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title 29, U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. They constituted a rotary drilling crew in drilling oil wells in the Panhandle Oil Field of Texas, or, as defendant put it, holes in the ground, for the defendant. All of them drew rather good wages ranging from around $6.50 to $7 and up to as high as $11 per day for their work. As a practical matter, in the drilling of these oil wells, the defendant used rotary rigs for drilling the wells down to, or near to, the pay sand. At that juncture, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. John v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Fleming v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1942
  5. Corbett v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API