Legal Opinion

Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1941No. 10066PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Another of the growing number of cases brought in this circuit, by employees under Section 16(b), 1 of the Fair Labor Stand ards Act of 1938, this suit was to recover for overtime pay. The claim in general was that plaintiffs were engaged in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of Section 3(j), 2 of the Act, and that they had worked overtime hours for which they had not been paid. The claim in particular was that defendant was a drilling contractor engaged in the business of drilling oil wells not for itself, but for others with rotary drilling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleming v. AH Belo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Hall v. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1941

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. John D. RainesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API