Legal Opinion

Frankland v. City of Lake Oswego

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This appeal is from a decree which dismissed with prejudice the plaintiffs’ suit for declaratory judgment, injunction, and, alternatively, damages. The motion to dismiss came at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case. Defendants sought to reserve the right to put on a case and there was a colloquy between court and counsel on this subject, but no decision.

Evidence or stipulations show all of the plaintiffs are property owners — principally home owners — who assert their rights under zoning ordinances were infringed by the concerted action of the defendants in bringing about a change in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Oregon City v. HartkeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Beshore v. Town of Bel AirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Roseta v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. West v. City of AstoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Neuberger v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Marion County Fire District 1 v. Marion-Polk County Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Multnomah County v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API