Legal Opinion
Oregon City v. Hartke
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1965PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment of conviction for the violation of a city zoning ordinance.
Defendants operated a wrecking yard on a parcel of land within Oregon City under an ordinance which permitted the operation as a non-conforming use. Defendants extended their wrecking operation to contiguous land without obtaining mxmicipal authorization to make a non-conforming use of this additional land. Defendants were convicted for making this latter use without authorization.
Defendants first contend that the zoning ordinance in question is invalid on the ground that it was not enacted in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.