Legal Opinion
Stabs v. City of Tower
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1949No. 35,013PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to two causes of action alleged in the complaint.
Two questions are presented for decision, viz.:(1) Whether a municipality owning and operating an on- and off-sale exclusive liquor store pursuant to statutory authorization (M. S. A. 340.07, subd. 5) is required to file the bond required by statute (§ 340.12) of on- and off-sale liquor dealers; and(2) Whether the owner and operator of an on- and off-sale exclusive liquor store is liable to a patron for harm self-inflicted as a consequence of having become so highly…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.