Ohio v. Helvering
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
Upon the motion of complainant for leave to file a bill of complaint invoking the original jurisdiction of this court, a rule was issued directing the defendants to show cause why such leave should not be granted. Defendants, by their return to the rule, oppose the motion upon the ground, among others, that the merits have been conclusively settled against complainant by prior decision of this court.
The bill alleges that the defendant Helvering is Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and that the other defendants are collectors of internal revenue in the several internal revenue districts in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.