Petersen v. National Flood Insurance Program
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, John and Anna Petersen (“plaintiffs” or “Petersens”), instituted this action against the National Flood Insurance Program (“defendant” or “NFIP”), to recover under their Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), the organization charged with administering the NFIP. The Petersens filed their complaint on July 5, 2001. After securing several extensions of time to respond to plaintiffs’ complaint, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Rafael Fabian v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- SIEDZIKOWSKI v. FEMA/NFIP DIRECTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023