Legal Opinion

Petersen v. National Flood Insurance Program

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 2002No. 2:01-cv-03376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, John and Anna Petersen (“plaintiffs” or “Petersens”), instituted this action against the National Flood Insurance Program (“defendant” or “NFIP”), to recover under their Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), the organization charged with administering the NFIP. The Petersens filed their complaint on July 5, 2001. After securing several extensions of time to respond to plaintiffs’ complaint, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Rafael Fabian v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. SIEDZIKOWSKI v. FEMA/NFIP DIRECTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API