Conkey v. Conkey
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Defendant seeks in this proceeding to procure the amendment of the decree entered in the case but not enrolled. The decreel granted plaintiff a divorce from bed and board, gave her the custody of the two children and provided for weekly payments by defendant for their support. The prosecuting attorney was served and appeared in the original proceedings. He was not served with notice of this petition and it is insisted that such failure to give notice prevented the court from acquiring jurisdiction of this application. We think this objection is answered by the case of Cole v. Cole, 193 Mich.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coon v. CoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Burlage v. BurlageMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lynder v. SS Kresge CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Cole v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Utley v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vial v. VialMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Ratcliffe v. RatcliffeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Rex v. RexMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Dorozenko v. DorozenkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.