Legal Opinion

Rex v. Rex

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1951No. Docket 32, Calendar 45,153PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

John Paul Res filed the bill of complaint in this Case for an absolute divorce. The defendant, Hazel, filed an answer and cross bill for separate maintenance, “under PA 1899 * No 243, as amended,” praying that the plaintiff-eross-defend.ant be required to pay sufficient sums for the support of herself and minor children, “pursuant to the provisions of PA 1899 * No 243, as amended by CL 1929, § 12794 (Stat Ann § 25.211).” Later, the defendant-cross-plaintiff filed, without objection, an amended cross bill praying for a decree from bed and hoard, “pursuant to CL 1929, § 12729.” †

These parties…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fletcher v. School Dist. Bd. of Ed.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Ratcliffe v. RatcliffeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Coon v. CoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Burlage v. BurlageMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Menor v. MenorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Yedinak v. YedinakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ovaitt v. OvaittMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Flynn v. FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Krueger v. KruegerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API