Legal Opinion

Dorozenko v. Dorozenko

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1967No. Docket 1,307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

February 27,1962, pláintiff, Mary Dorozenko, filed a complaint for separate maintenance in the Wayne circuit court, which specified * that it was filed pursuant to CL 1948, § 552.301 (Stat Ann 1957 Bev § 25.211).

April 17, 1964, defendant, Harry Dorozenko, filed a cross-bill of complaint for absolute divorce. A two-day trial was conducted and the court.adjourned the matter in the hopes that there might be a reconciliation. On May 28, 1965, the court entered a separate maintenance judgment for plaintiff.

Defendant filed a motion to vacate the judgment, which the trial court denied, stating:

“The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gardner v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Fish v. FishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Conkey v. ConkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bielefeld v. BielefeldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. SimpsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Simpson v. SimpsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API