Legal Opinion

Ratcliffe v. Ratcliffe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1944No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 42,585PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

The parties hereto were married on November 2, 1939, when both were 19 years old, and attending school. Within a month following their marriage the parties separated, later resumed their marital relations for about 5 or 6 weeks and, except for periods totaling about two weeks thereafter, have not lived together since. The parties have an infant daughter.

Plaintiff Thomas F. Batcliffe filed a bill of complaint on November 18,1941, seeking a divorce from defendant Eloise J. Batcliffe on the ground of exr treme cruelty. The defendant filed an answer and cross bill in which she sought a divorce…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burlage v. BurlageMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Winter v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McFarlane v. McFarlaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sullivan v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Goodspeed v. GoodspeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rex v. RexMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ripatti v. RipattiIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pierson v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lytle v. LytleMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Reed v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API