Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Nebel v. Nebel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, one of the members, the Ghief Justice, not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action, without becoming a precedent. Gooch v. Western Union Tel. Co., 196 N. C., 823; Tarboro v. Johnson, 196 N. C., 824; Parsons v. Board of Education, 200 N. C., 88; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durham v. . LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Town of Tarboro v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Parsons v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Parrish v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Trust Co v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Allen v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. McMahan v. . BasingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Braswell v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API