Legal Opinion

Trust Co v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHENCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. This is a proceeding to recover certain bonds now in the possession of the defendant Commissioner of Banks, who holds the same as assets of the Central Bank and Trust Company of Asheville, N.C. an insolvent banking corporation.

By consent a trial of the issues of fact by a jury was waived. At the request of the parties, the judge heard the evidence and found the facts, and on the facts found by him, and set out in the judgment, it was adjudged that the defendant Commissioner of Banks is the owner and entitled to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Martin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Hayes v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Beam v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Beam v. News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API