Legal Opinion

Durham v. . Lloyd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.. The court being evenly divided in opinion as to the validity of defendant’s assignments of error on his appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment is affirmed, in accordance with the practice in this Court. This decision disposes of the appeal, without becoming a precedent. Parsons v. Board of Education, ante, 88, 156 S. E., 244; Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 196 N. C., 823, 146 S. E., 803, and cases cited.

Affirmed.

BrogdeN, J., not sitting.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gooch v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Parsons v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. ManeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Garrison v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API