Parrish v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, three members of the Court being of opinion that the demurrer should be sustained and three members of the Court being of opinion that the demurrer should be overruled, Justice I. Beverly Lake taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed after the manner of the usual practice of ap pellate courts in such cases and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. James v. Rogers, 231 N.C. 668, 58 S.E. 2d 640; MacClure v. Accident and Casualty Ins. Co., 230 N.C. 661, 55 S.E.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- James v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Town of Tarboro v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Sharpe v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- In re WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- James v. Piedmont Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967