Legal Opinion

Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 18, 2000No. 99 C 1716PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Before the court are (1) thirteen motions in limine brought by plaintiffs Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd. (“IHC”) and Bar Technologies, L.L.C. (“Bar”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) and (2) five motions in limine brought by defendants Hetran, Inc. (“He-tran”) and Global Technology, Inc. (“Global”) (collectively “defendants”). 1 The court addresses each motion in turn.

A. Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine

1. Evidence of Wolfgang Salinger’s arrest or detention in Korea and Hetran’s lawsuit against Wolfgang Salinger

Wolfgang Salinger (“Salinger”) is a former employee of Hetran.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Stuart Park Associates Limited Partnership and Stuart Park/summit Partners v. Ameritech Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. F. E. Holmes & Son Construction Co. v. Gualdoni Electric Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Danny Snapp v. Bnsf Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. A.I. Credit Corporation v. Legion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. New Horizont, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Vehicle Market Research, Inc. v. Mitchell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. 721 Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API