Legal Opinion
Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 22, 2000No. 99 C 1716PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs/eounter-de-fendants’ motion' to dismiss defendant/counter-plaintiffs counterclaim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the court grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs/counter-defendants’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant/counter-plaintiff Hetran, Incorporated (“Hetran”) has filed a six count counterclaim against plaintiffs/counter-defendants Industrial Hard Chrome, Limited (“IHC”), and Bar Technologies (“Bar”) (collectively “counter-defendants”). Count 1 is a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Perkins v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Cirrincione v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Industrial Hard Chrome, Ltd. v. Hetran, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- United States v. Cancer Treatment Centers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Bondi v. Grant Thornton InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- DE DAVID v. Alaron Trading Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.