Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Kenney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The complaint contains five causes of action based upon the filing of five criminal complaints against respondent, charging him with the embezzlement of various sums in excess of $60. It is alleged that each criminal complaint was sworn to by appellant Kenney at the instigation, request and with the connivance and agreement of appellants Randall and Folland, officers, agents and employees of the three defendant corporations; that the same was done maliciously and without probable cause; that respondent was required to give…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Kolka v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Brown v. SelfridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McLeod v. McLeodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Boomer v. IsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Randol v. Kline's IncorporatedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Allen v. MoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API