Legal Opinion
Cuneo Law Group, P.C. v. Joseph
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0246PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, The Cuneo Law Group, P.C. and Jonathan W. Cuneo, seek a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2006) regarding the parties’ respective rights under a settlement agreement resolving previous litigation between the parties and injunctive relief prohibiting future breaches of the agreement. First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (“Am. Compl.”) ¶¶ 55-60. This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint or in the Alternative, Transfer the Case to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ham v. Tjx Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Pietrangelo v. Refresh Club, IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Tompkins v. StifelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019