Legal Opinion
Cruz v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 20, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00874Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIANA CRUZ, Case No.: 23-cv-874-L-KSC 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY 13 v. MOTION [Doc. No. 40] 14 NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The parties’ Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute is before the 18 Court. See Doc. No. 40 (the “Joint Motion”). Plaintiff seeks an order compelling defendant 19 to respond to (1) plaintiff’s interrogatory numbers 4, 5, 18, and 22; and (2) plaintiff’s 20 request for production numbers 2, 8, 11, 12, 13, 16, and 21. See id. at 4-6. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Marlyn Sali v. Corona Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Von Schrader v. MiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.