Legal Opinion

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1985No. 84-982PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is whether the commission properly limited the refund of overrecovered system loss costs to the audit period under review. Appellant OCC contends that the commission should have ordered a refund of all excess system loss costs collected pursuant to the so-called EFC rule embodied in Ohio Adm. Code Chapter 4901:1-11. Specifically, OCC asserts that since the commission itself has acknowledged that use of the rule resulted in an overrecovery of system loss costs,1 the commission abuses its discretion when it does not order a refund of all excess amounts collected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Shafer v. Wintrow (In Re Wintrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API