Legal Opinion

Western Contracting Corp. v. Bechtel Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1989No. Nos. 86-1056, 88-1139PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

In this diversity action on a contract for dredging a channel in the Chesapeake Bay, Western Contracting Corporation (hereafter Western), L. Garland Everist, Hubert Everist, Jr., and Neil E. Dawson appeal from a district court judgment in favor of Bechtel Corporation and Baltimore Gas & Electric Company (hereafter referred to as Bechtel) and from the district court’s denial of their motion for a partial new trial. Western initiated this action by filing a claim against Bechtel for amounts due under the dredging contract. Twenty-one months after they filed timely…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Columbia Briargate Company, a Limited Partnership v. First National Bank in Dallas Vaughn Pearson and A.S. Kyzer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Singletary v. Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Brink v. First Credit ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
  5. Goehring v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API