Legal Opinion

United States v. Glenn

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 20, 1989No. ACMR 8800298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of members of forcible sodomy upon a child under the age of sixteen years and assault and battery upon a child under the age of sixteen years in violation of Articles 125 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 928 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for two years.

On appeal, appellant asserts an array of assignments of error, one of which merits remedial action: a contention that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. RodgersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. GambleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. EllseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. TunnellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. MooreU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. SouzaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API