Legal Opinion

United States v. Barber

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1911No. 444PublishedCited by 42 opinions

ERROR to THE DISTRICT COURT ' OF the united states FOR THE DISTRICT. OF IDAHO. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

On April 14, 1908, in the District Court of the United States for the District of Idaho, an indictment was re turned, which, in four counts, charged James T. Barber, Sumner G. Moon, Frank Martin and Albert E. Palmer with having violated the conspiracy section of the Revised Statutes, viz., § 5440. In the court below Frank Martin was dismissed from the indictment. Palmer made no appearance, presumably not having been arrested.

The final judgment, to reverse which this writ of error was sued out, is as follows:

“Now came the attorneys for the respective parties herein and thereupon the demurrer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API