Legal Opinion

United States v. Souza

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 15, 1990No. NMCM 89 2803PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have examined the record of trial, the two assignments of error, and the Government’s response. Appellant alleges that Charge I and its two specifications and Specifications 1 through 3 of Charge II were barred by the statute of limitations and, thus, that appellant’s guilty pleas to these offenses were improvident. There are no allegations of error with respect to Specifications 4 and 5, Charge II.

The two specifications of Charge I and Specifications 1 through 3 of Charge II allege two specifications of sodomy between January 1985 and August 1988, two specifications of indecent acts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RodgersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. BabcockU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  3. United States v. GlennU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. ShinaultU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CoombsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API