United States v. Souza
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
We have examined the record of trial, the two assignments of error, and the Government’s response. Appellant alleges that Charge I and its two specifications and Specifications 1 through 3 of Charge II were barred by the statute of limitations and, thus, that appellant’s guilty pleas to these offenses were improvident. There are no allegations of error with respect to Specifications 4 and 5, Charge II.
The two specifications of Charge I and Specifications 1 through 3 of Charge II allege two specifications of sodomy between January 1985 and August 1988, two specifications of indecent acts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RodgersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. BabcockU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. GlennU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. ShinaultU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. CoombsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994