Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Chartrand
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
In July, 1918, Richard A. Chartrand, Jr., was employed by the Charles R. Hedden Company at Lakehurst, New Jersey, and sustained bodily injuries while in the course of his employment which resulted in the loss of an eye. Under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of that State the Charles R. Hedden Company was obliged to pay, and did pay to its injured employee the sum of $1,368.50 through the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company pursuant to its agreement of insurance.
The Workmen’s Compensation Law of New Jersey, chapter 95 of the Laws of 1911, as amended by chapter 174 of the Laws of 1913,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- O'Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Claim of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Claim of Petterson v. Daystrom Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Landon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Hoehn v. SchenckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Commonwealth v. BealsNew York Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.