Hoehn v. Schenck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.
The action is against a physician for malpractice in treating plaintiff’s left foot which had been fractured as the result of an accident occurring to plaintiff in the course of his employment. The answer admits the treatment of plaintiff by defendant as a physician, but denies negligence or lack of skill. As a separate defense, it is alleged that plaintiff’s fractured foot, suffered by him in the course of his employment, was compensated for by an award made by the State Industrial Commission, inclusive of the “ consequential result of such injury.” This separate defense further alleges that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Ader v. BlauNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Miller v. New York Railways Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Claim of Pavia v. Petroleum Iron Works Co. of PennsylvaniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ChartrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Hanson v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Overbeek v. NexMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Stewart Becker, Ltd. v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Pederson v. EppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.