Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Beals
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLytle, J.
This action is brought to recover for labor performed in the construction of a public highway in the State of Pennsylvania. On or about January 9, 1929, the plaintiff’s father, Paul R. Beals, entered into a contract with the State of Pennsylvania for the improvement of a section of a highway located in Potter county. Pursuant to a statutory requirement the contractor was obliged to furnish a bond which, among other things, provided that the *786contractor would well and truly pay for all labor performed and material furnished in the performance of said contract. The defendant Hartford Accident…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Pickering v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
- Johnson Service Co. v. E. H. Monin, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Buffalo Cement Co. v. McNaughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- The Eastern Steel Company v. . Globe Indemnity CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Omega New York Products Corp. v. Parisi Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- Long v. FerrisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- State ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MehanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Colonial Baking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952