Legal Opinion
Wild Wilderness v. Allen
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 14, 2014No. Civil No. 6:13-0523-TCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COFFIN, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. They seek to set aside a decision by the Forest Service to construct the Kapka Sno-park.
Presently before the court are plaintiffs’ motion (# 30) for summary judgment, the defendant-intervenor’s1 cross-motion (# 35) for summary judgment, and defendants’ cross-motion (#36) for summary judgment.
Excluding the Administrative Record (AR), declarations and exhibits, there are more than 215 pages of briefing on these motions. Plaintiffs make numerous arguments…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Montana Environmental Information Center v. U.S. Office of Surface MiningDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2017
- Agdaagux Tribe of King Cove v. JewellDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2015
- Jabez Rezene Gebremariam v. Warden of California City Immigration Processing Center, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026