Legal Opinion
Agdaagux Tribe of King Cove v. Jewell
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 8, 2015No. 3:14-cv-0110-HRHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
Plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiff move for summary judgment.1 This motion is opposed and defendants and intervenor-defendants cross-move for summary judgment.2 The cross-motions are opposed.3 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary.
Facts
Plaintiffs are the Agdaagux Tribe of King Cove, the Native Village of Belkofski, the King Cove Corporation (KCC),4 the Aleutians East Borough, the City of King Cove, Etta Kuzakin, and Leff Kenezuroff.5 Intervenor-plaintiff is the State of Alaska.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metcalf v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Center for Biological Diversity v. National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020