Legal Opinion

May v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1899No. 1698PublishedCited by 12 opinions

No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of gaming, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10, and he appeals.

The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss the appeal herein, on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. The Twenty-fifth Legislature amended article 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and provided a form for recognizance on appeal in misdemeanor cases. Among other things, said bond is conditioned that “appellant, who has been convicted in this case of a mis demeanor, and his punishment assessed at $-, as more fully appears from…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Hext v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API