Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Campbell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1911No. 488PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The assistant attorney-general has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the recognizance is defective. The recognizance does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant as required by article 887, Code of Criminal Procedure. The recognizance being defective, the motion is sustained. See May v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 196.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Sweeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Eckert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API