Hext v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This conviction was for aggravated assault. The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the recognizance is defective. An examination of the recognizance shows that it does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant, as required by article 887, Code Criminal Procedure. May v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 196. The motion is sustained; and the appeal accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
ON REHEARING.
November 22, 1905.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peacock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Daffan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928