Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 17, 1912No. 1715PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
The Assistant Attorney-General has moved to dismiss the appeal, because the recognizance is not in compliance with article 919 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The recognizance does not state the punishment assessed, and the motion is sustained. May v. The State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 196; Johnson v. The State, 49 S. W. Rep., 594; Martin v. The State, 89 S. W. Rep., 642.
Appeal dismissed.
Dismissed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930