Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Atkinson v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1892No. 19011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The question involved in this case is the validity of an ordinance of the board of supervisors of Santa Barbara County, made April .10, 1891, fixing the salaries of the constables of the various townships of the county for their services in criminal cases. In each of the townships 1, 3, and 8, the annual salary for such services was fixed at $24, in No. 2 at $480, and in each of the remaining townships specific sums, varying in amounts. This order was made pursuant to subdivision 14 of section 183 of “ an act to establish a uniform system of county and township governments,”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Fleming v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McGowan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Mitchell v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API