Legal Opinion

Whiting v. Bryant

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1956No. 23330PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J:

This appeal on questions of law and fact comes to this Court from a judgment of the common pleas court of Cuyahoga County, removing the defendant, George A. Bryant from the voting committee provided for under provisions of the Sarah and Samuel Austin Trusts, the court finding by its judgment that there was a conflict of interests.

In 1930, Samuel and Sarah Austin each created an inter vivos trust appointing The Cleveland Trust Company trustee to carry out its purposes. The primary assets of each trust was and is stock, both common and preferred, of The Austin Company. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ingalls v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. SharrettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. In Re Estate of BostOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Schmidt v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Whiting v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Grogan v. GroganTexas Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API