Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Bost

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1983No. 45751PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

In this case Phillip Kurtz (“appellant”) appeals the order of the probate court removing him as executor of the estate of the deceased. For the reasons adduced below, the judgment is affirmed.

I

The record indicates that the will and codicil of Carol G. Bost disposed of a substantial estate composed almost entirely of realty. Kurtz was named both executor of the estate and trustee of a testamentary trust established in favor of the decedent’s son, Stephen Bost, his wife, and children.

On August 4,1981, about two months after the decedent’s death, the appellant’s application to administer the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ingalls v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. In Re Estate of JarvisOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. In Re Trust of MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Manchester v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Whiting v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RussolilloOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re Guardianship of EscolaOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re Estate of RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Diemert v. Diemert, Unpublished Decision (12-4-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. In Re Estate of ClapsaddleOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API