Legal Opinion

Grogan v. Grogan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1959No. A-6969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case involves the validity of two voting trusts agreements. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered a judgment holding both trusts to be invalid. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 315 S.W. 2d 34.

We do not believe the voting trusts to be invalid simply because H. N. Grogan, a settlor and the person for whose benefit it was found the trusts were executed, was himself a party to the agreement and was named as a trustee in them. See Boyer v. Nesbitt, 227 Pa. 398, 76 Atl. 103; De Marco v. Paramount Ice Corp. [Supreme Court of New York] 102 N.Y.S. 2d 692;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyer v. NesbittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. De Marco v. Paramount Ice Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Whiting v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Grogan v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R. H. Sanders Corp. v. HavesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API