Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Sharretts

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 18, 1962No. [No. 195, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.

The essential question presented here is whether the Chancellor erred in holding a voting trust and employment and management agreements to be legally valid and binding.

The involved facts, detailed in twelve volumes of stenographic transcript, begin with the attempted purchase by Constas G. Basiliko (one of the appellants-plaintiffs) of several Maryland properties located mainly in the Washington, D.C. suburban area, and valuable for commercial development, from one Max Offenberg. The transaction was being conducted by Basiliko in the name of one Louis Sommers (who, it appears, had been dead…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ScheungrabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Wabash Ry. Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Ingalls v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Mangels v. TippettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Wright v. Commercial & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Prince George's Country Club, Inc. v. Edward R. Carr, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Denice v. Spotswood I. Quinby, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API