Legal Opinion
Alper v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 5, 2000No. Civ.A. No. 97-30194-MAPPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA (Docket No. 35)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The present dispute in this personal injury action takes place at the intersection of Rules 26, 34 and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The United States of America (“Defendant”) seeks to quash a subpoena issued by Arnold Alper (“Plaintiff’) to Defendant’s medical expert, Dr. Gerald Becker. Defendant claims that the subpoena, described by both parties as a “subpoena duces tecum,” should be quashed because it is burdensome, seeks privileged material and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1995
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Hasbro, Inc. v. SerafinoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Marsh v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mortgage Information Services, Inc. v. KitchensDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Dreyer v. GACS Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
- Federal Trade Commission v. Netscape Communications Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Williamson v. Horizon Lines LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Smith v. Transducer Technology, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.