Legal Opinion

Beckley v. Vezu

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1937No. Civ. 1681PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant county appealed from an order denying its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the respondents have moved to affirm the order thus appealed from upon the ground that there is no sufficient record before this court. It is contended that no reporter’s transcript has been properly or legally filed herein because the request for the preparation of such a transcript was not made within ten days after notice of the making of the order appealed from.

On July 31, 1936, the appellant filed a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, reserving the right to move…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barthelmess v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Wrynn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API