Legal Opinion

Puterman v. Puterman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1949No. 2425PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Riner, Chief Justice.

The District Court of Laramie County declined to open a default judgment in favor of the husband Sam Puterman in an action wherein the latter was plaintiff and his wife, Sarah, was defendant. Both parties are of Jewish nationality and will be hereinafter usually referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendant.” The petition in the action filed September 12, 1947 alleged as a ground for the divorce “that the defendant has offered the plaintiff such indignities as to render plaintiff’s condition intolerable.” The judgment aforesaid was rendered upon personal service of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Iron Mountain Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Harkness v. JarvisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  5. Parks v. CoyneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard v. LindmierWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Redwine v. FitzhughWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Eager v. DerowitschWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  5. City of Evanston v. Whirl Inn, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API