Legal Opinion

Redwine v. Fitzhugh

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1958No. 2832PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*413OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HarnsbergerJustice Harnsberger

Plaintiffs sued in trespass and a jury awarded plaintiff Laura Redwine $1,000 damages against defendant Gordon Fitzhugh, but it also awarded defendant Gordon Fitzhugh $2,351 upon his cross-petition against plaintiff Laura Redwine as damages for her interference with his diversion dam and headgates with resulting loss or destruction of his crops. No appeal is taken from the $1,000 judgment in plaintiff’s favor, but plaintiff appeals from the judgment adverse to her.

The case comes to us upon an Agreed Statement of Case On Appeal, under the provision of Rule 75 of our new Wyoming Rules of…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. People v. WilkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. International Agri. Cor. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. Summers v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Western National Bank of Casper v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ely v. KirkWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Wardell v. McMillanWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API