Legal Opinion

City of Evanston v. Whirl Inn, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1982No. 5660PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

Appellant City of Evanston, while considering whether to renew appellee Whirl Inn, Inc.’s retail liquor license, decided that the license should be restricted such that the sale of alcoholic beverages would be allowed only at appellee’s drive-up window. Because Evanston’s decision effectively shut down appellee’s lounge and disco, Whirl Inn appealed to the district court under § 12-4-104(e), W.S.1977. 1 The district court heard the appeal as a “trial de novo” as provided by § 12-4-104(f), W.S. 1977 2 and decided in Whirl Inn’s favor. The City of Evanston was then ordered to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. FerrantoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, LARAMIE CTY SCH. D. NO. 1 v. SpiegelWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Teton County Youth Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lindsey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Foster's Inc. v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Oukrop v. WasserburgerWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API