Legal Opinion
State v. Knybel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 2007No. SC 17650PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The defendant, Michael Knybel, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation imposed in connection with a previous conviction. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly revoked his probation under General Statutes § 53a-32. The defendant’s claim is twofold. First, the defendant contends that the court improperly determined that he had violated the general condition of his probation, namely, that he not violate the laws of the state, by operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under suspension in violation of General…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. BolesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. WinotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MadigoskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. ARTHUR H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. Daniel G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.