Legal Opinion
State v. ARTHUR H.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 26, 2008No. SC 18100PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, Arthur H., appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering that, for a period of ten years following his release from incarceration for his conviction of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (l),2 he register in the state’s sex offender registry pursuant to General Statutes § 54-254,3 a provision in the statutory scheme commonly *585known as “Megan’s Law.” He claims that the order constituted an abuse of discretion and requests that the order be vacated. In the alternative, the defendant claims that the trial court’s failure to hold…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. RuparSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.