Legal Opinion

Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1979No. 77-671, 77-672PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These are appeals by Max and Esther Gray, plaintiffs below, from jury verdicts in favor of defendant, Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd. Mrs. Gray sued for personal injuries sustained when she slipped and fell in the grandstand area of defendant's dog track. Her husband claimed damages for medical expenses and loss of consortium.

On March 22, 1976, Max and Esther Gray, along with their son Terry, attended the dog track owned and operated by Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd. They paid a general admission fee and were admitted to the grandstand area of the facility at approximately 7:00 p.m., prior to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Crawford Johnson & Co. v. DuffnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Alabama Power Company v. TatumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Underwriters Nat'l Assur. Co. v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. DELCHAMPS, INCORPORATED v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. McClendon v. Mountain Top Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Atkins v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Grider v. GriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Bogue v. R & M GROCERYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API