Pilkington ex rel. Pilkington v. Peking Chinese Restaurant, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ALMON, Justice.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict for the defendant in a per*587sona] injury action. Brittney Pilkington, a six-month-old infant, was injured when hot tea spilled on her while she and her family were dining at the premises of the Peking Chinese Restaurant, Inc. (“the Restaurant”). By and through her mother as next friend, Brittney filed a complaint alleging that the Restaurant1 “owed a duty to keep its premises reasonably safe, [to] protect the plaintiff against any unreasonable risk of injury, or to warn plaintiff (or plaintiffs guardian) of any known danger,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Nunn v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Trans-South-Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. WeinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Decker v. HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- General Elec. Co. v. MacKSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. Bic CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- State v. PittmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012