In re Drexel Hill Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Drexel Hill Motor Company, bankrupt. On review of order of referee.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The Maxwell Sales Corporation, by its attorney, presented to the referee within the year after the date of *674adjudication, September 27, 1918, a proof of claim under oath for $2,523.26 for automobiles shipped by the claimant. It set out the names and numbers of the cars, that the amount claimed was over and above all legal set-offs, and that no payment had been made upon the indebtedness, or no security of any kind given. According to the referee’s certificate and opinion, the claim was returned to the attorney for the claimant, because it did not conform to the form of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In re RoeberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Hutchinson v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
- In re BashaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- In re FairlambDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. of Newark v. KeebleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- In Re FinkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
- In Re Berkshire Hardware Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- Ragan v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924